We offer competitive flat rate pricing with flexible payment plans-speak to a lawyer

☎ 863.250.2990





Creating Joint Interests by Gift in Florida: A Step-by-Step Exploration Through One Family’s Story

Probate Lawyers in Lakeland Florida. We Provide experienced Probate Legal Services in Polk County, Central Florida and the entire State of Florida.

Call 863.250.2990 today to schedule a Free Consultation with our skilled Probate attorneys.




All Posts

March 04, 2025

When people think of “giving” property, they often picture a simple handover of an item or money. Yet under Florida law, creating a joint interest in property—especially one with a right of survivorship—can be surprisingly complex. A well-planned gift can confer present ownership, ensure smoother inheritance, and avoid disputes later on. But a poorly executed attempt can fail entirely, leaving loved ones tied up in legal battles. This post explores the rules governing how to create valid joint interests by gift, weaving in a running example of a family scenario to illustrate the concepts in action.

1. Meet Carla and Amanda: A Family Example

Carla, an elderly Florida resident, wants to share her financial good fortune with her niece, Amanda. To make matters easier if something happens to her, Carla decides to add Amanda as a co-owner of her certificate of deposit (CD) at the local bank. Carla envisions two benefits: (1) Amanda will have the right to use funds if Carla needs help managing her bills, and (2) if Carla passes away, Amanda automatically inherits the account, avoiding a lengthy probate. But is this straightforward addition of Amanda’s name to the CD truly a valid “gift” creating a joint tenancy or tenancy by the entireties (if spouses were involved)? Florida courts say it depends on a few key requirements.

2. The Core Ingredients of a Valid Gift

Florida courts have long held that three elements are crucial to forming any valid gift—whether it’s an outright gift or one that creates a joint interest. In Chase Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Sullivan, 127 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1961), the court reaffirmed these requirements:

  • Present Donative Intent: The donor (Carla) must intend to pass an immediate ownership interest to the donee (Amanda).
  • Delivery: Carla must transfer control of the property (or something symbolic of it) to Amanda in a way that surrenders Carla’s exclusive dominion.
  • Acceptance: Amanda must accept the gift—though this is usually presumed if the transfer benefits her.

If any of these three elements is lacking, the gift fails. Let’s walk through how they apply to Carla and Amanda’s situation.

3. Present Donative Intent: More Than a Future Wish

Carla tells Amanda, “I want you on this account so you can pay any bills if I’m ill, and eventually have the rest after I’m gone.” Is that enough? Under Florida law, Carla must have a present intent to transfer some ownership now. If she’s merely saying, “You’ll get this after I die,” that is a future gift—more akin to a will. As the Florida Supreme Court held in In re Slawson’s Estate, 41 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 1949), a “mere intention to give in the future” is not enforceable.

  • Scenario Check: Carla’s words should clearly reflect that Amanda immediately owns an interest in the CD. If Carla’s statements or the bank documents show she only intended for Amanda to inherit upon Carla’s death, the transfer might be deemed testamentary. In that case, it would need to meet the formalities of a will (e.g., witnessed, signed, etc.)—and the attempt to create a “joint interest” would fail.

4. Delivery: Relaxed Standards for Joint Accounts

Typically, a donor must physically hand over the gift or sign over title. For intangible assets like a bank account, Florida courts have eased this requirement. In Spark v. Canny, 88 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 1956), the Supreme Court recognized that where a donor and donee share a joint account, the “thing given” is not the specific money in the account but rather the right to withdraw. Consequently, Carla could keep making withdrawals for herself and still validly gift a present interest to Amanda.

  • Scenario Check: Carla and Amanda visit the bank together. The bank officer retitles the CD as “Carla andAmanda, joint tenants with right of survivorship,” and issues a new account card that both Carla and Amanda sign. This act typically satisfies the delivery requirement—Carla has relinquished sole dominion and given Amanda co-ownership rights.

5. Acceptance: Usually Automatic

Acceptance of a beneficial gift—like a share in a CD—is usually presumed. Rarely would Amanda reject this financial benefit. In the (unlikely) event Amanda refused or never knew about the joint account, the validity of the gift might be questioned. But in Florida, courts typically assume acceptance when the gift has clear financial value. As confirmed in Naylor v. U.S. Trust Company of Florida, 711 So. 2d 1350 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), acceptance can be inferred from the donee’s conduct and the nature of the asset.

  • Scenario Check: Amanda signs the joint account documents at the bank without objection. This action cements her acceptance. Even if Amanda never withdraws a dime, her signature indicates she agreed to the gift.

6. Gifts Inter Vivos vs. Gifts Causa Mortis

Carla’s intention is to provide for Amanda during Carla’s life (and beyond). This setup is a gift inter vivos—an unconditional, immediate transfer of interest. If Carla were gifting the account because she believed she was on her deathbed, hoping that Amanda would own it if she succumbed to her illness, it might be a gift causa mortis. Florida law imposes stricter rules on gifts causa mortis (see Leonard v. Campbell, 138 Fla. 405, 189 So. 839 (1939)), because they can be revoked if the donor recovers.

  • Scenario Check: Carla is healthy and simply preparing for future contingencies, so this is an inter vivos gift. Amanda’s right in the account is not contingent on Carla’s death or any illness.

7. What If the Gift Is Challenged?

The mere presence of Amanda’s name on the account typically raises a rebuttable presumption (meaning it be challenged) that Carla made a gift. As Florida courts note in cases like Varela v. Bernachea, 917 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), the burden shifts to anyone challenging the gift (for example, Carla’s other relatives) to prove Carla did not intend a present transfer. If Carla’s estate, after her death, claimed that “Carla only put Amanda on the account for convenience,” they would need clear and convincing evidence—such as statements from Carla disclaiming Amanda’s ownership or proof that Carla forbid Amanda from withdrawing funds.

  • Scenario Check: Suppose Carla’s nephew, who is not a beneficiary, insists Carla only added Amanda as a “signer” but never meant to give her a joint interest. Florida law says the nephew must present strong evidence (beyond hearsay or speculation) to overcome the presumption of a gift arising from the joint account designation.

8. The Final Outcome for Carla and Amanda

If Carla has done everything correctly:

  1. She clearly communicated to the bank (and Amanda) her present intent for Amanda to share ownership.
  2. She delivered the interest by signing the new account forms, effectively transferring co-ownership.
  3. Amanda accepted by adding her signature and subsequently having the right to withdraw funds.

Assuming none of Carla’s heirs can convincingly rebut that intent, Amanda stands to inherit the entire account automatically when Carla passes away—without the asset going through probate. This convenience is one of the main reasons many Floridians choose to create joint interests by gift for bank accounts, CDs, and other financial assets.

9. Key Takeaways and Best Practices

  1. Get the Wording Right: Specify “joint tenants with right of survivorship” (or equivalent language) to confirm the present intent to share ownership.
  2. Document the Donative Intent: Keep records or even a simple letter describing why you’re adding a name. If disputes arise, having this evidence helps.
  3. Be Clear About “Convenience” vs. “Ownership”: If the donor truly wants help with check-writing or bill-paying but does not wish to give an ownership stake, it’s safer to use a power of attorney or a “convenience account” that does not legally vest joint title.
  4. Consult an Attorney: Joint accounts or gifts can serve estate planning goals but can also create unexpected results if not done properly—particularly in blended families or where multiple heirs may challenge the arrangement.

Conclusion

Creating a joint interest by gift in Florida hinges on present intent, delivery, and acceptance—elements often examined under a more flexible standard when it comes to joint bank accounts. The story of Carla and Amanda shows how a clearly documented, intentional process can give the donee real ownership now, and a straightforward right of survivorship later. But it also highlights the pitfalls if you’re not explicit: future promises, unclear account titles, or half-executed transfers can derail even well-meaning plans.

By understanding the legal framework and planning carefully—preferably with guidance from a qualified Florida attorney—individuals like Carla can ensure their gifts stand on firm ground. In doing so, they help prevent family feuds and guarantee that their generosity benefits their chosen loved ones in the way they truly intend.




If you have questions about Probate issues, don’t wait—make sure your legal rights are protected. Call 863.250.2990 today to schedule your Free Consultation with our Probate attorneys.


Matthew T. Morrison

Attorney, Matthew T. Morrison

A graduate of Jones Law, he is our team lead for the probate department and case management. He is the one to establish the plan in court.


Read More

Carlos E. Carrillo

Attorney, Carlos E. Carrillo

A graduate of St Thomas Law, Carlos is head of client management and client relations. He is the master of what happens out of court.


Read More

Carlos E. Carrillo

Attorney, Carlos E. Carrillo

A graduate of St Thomas Law, Carlos is head of client management and client relations. He is the master of what happens out of court.


Read More

Get Started

Contact us and get a free consultation in our offices

Free Consultation

Criminal Defense Lawyers

TESTIMONIALS

  • "Excellent experience. Provided needed legal documents for a medical emergency. Exceptional support and efficiency in communication made the process stress free. My compliments to Mathew Morrison and his staff. Highly recommend."
    — Brandy Wingate
  • "Shelee M. was very helpful with my situation. She was able to look at my property deed on line and took my problem to the attorneys immediately. She was kind and helped resolve my situation and expeditiously. I would highly recommend this firm and will use them again myself."
    — Paulette Copley
  • "This firm was very helpful in my probate case. They were excellent and willing to help no matter what. They were able to resolve my case fast. I was impress with their work. I give them a 10 out of 10. Thank you again from the Mangual family."
    — Elmo Mangual
  • "I was very happy with the compassion and caring about the loss of my brother. The professional handling of the legal issues was the very best that I could have asked for. Thank you."
    - Stephen Brown
  • "Omgoodness!! Had an emergent issue, spoke with Shelee, not only did she take the time to listen and understand our problem, she obtained the solution!! If you EVER have a need for a probate attorney, MTM law firm is amazing!!"
    - Paula Halterman

Probate Lawyers serving Polk County Florida, including: Lakeland, Winter Haven, Bartow, Auburndale, Babson Park, Bowling Green, Bradely Junction, Brewster, Combee Settlement, Crooked Lake Park, Crystal Lake, Cypress Gardens, Davenport, Dundee, Eagle Lake, Fort Meade, Frostproof, Fussels Corner, Gibsonia, Green Pond, Haines City, Highland Park, Highlands City, Hillcrest Heights, Jan Phyl Village, Inwood, Kathleen, Lake Alfred, Lake Hamilton, Lake Wales, Lakeland Highlands, Mulberry, Polk City, Willow Oak, Wahneta, Waverley, Hillsborough County Florida, including: Tampa, Brandon, Plant City, Citrus Park, Temple Terrace, Apollo Beach, Balm, Bealsville, Bloomingdale, Cheval, Dover, Egypt Lake-Leto, Fort Lonesome, Gibsonton, Greater Carrollwood, Greater Sun Center, Gulf City, Hopewell, Keysville, Lake Magdalene, Lithia, Lutz, Mango, Orient Park, Palm River-Clair Mel, Pebble Creek, Progress Village, Riverview, Ruskin, Seffner, Sun City, Thonotosassa, Town 'N Country, Turkey Creek, Valrico, Westchase, Wimauma, Ybor City, Orange County Florida, including: Orlando, Maitland, Apopka, Winter Park, Alafaya, Bay Lake, Belle Isle, Bithlo, Christmas, Doctor Phillips, Eatonville, Edgewood, Fairway Shores, Goldenrod, Gotha, Hunter's Creek, Lake Buena Vista, Lockhart, Meadow Woods, Oakland, Ocoee, Orlovista, Pine Castle, Pine Hills, Southchase, South Apopka, Taft, Tangerine, Union Park, Wedgefield, Williamsburg, Windermere, Winter Garden, Zellwood, Central Florida and throughout the State of Florida.


DISCLAIMER: The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask the lawyer to send you free written information about their qualifications and experience. This website has been prepared for informational purposes only and not as legal advice. Neither the transmission, nor your receipt of information from this website creates an attorney-client relationship, which can only be formed in writing between you and the attorney you choose to represent you.

© Copyright 2024. The MTM Law Firm PLLC  All Rights Reserved.


Probate Lawyers | The MTM Law Firm PLLC |
863.250.2990