We offer competitive flat rate pricing with flexible payment plans-speak to a lawyer
Call 863.250.2990 today to schedule a Free Consultation with our skilled Probate attorneys.
March 04, 2025
When people think of “giving” property, they often picture a simple handover of an item or money. Yet under Florida law, creating a joint interest in property—especially one with a right of survivorship—can be surprisingly complex. A well-planned gift can confer present ownership, ensure smoother inheritance, and avoid disputes later on. But a poorly executed attempt can fail entirely, leaving loved ones tied up in legal battles. This post explores the rules governing how to create valid joint interests by gift, weaving in a running example of a family scenario to illustrate the concepts in action.
Carla, an elderly Florida resident, wants to share her financial good fortune with her niece, Amanda. To make matters easier if something happens to her, Carla decides to add Amanda as a co-owner of her certificate of deposit (CD) at the local bank. Carla envisions two benefits: (1) Amanda will have the right to use funds if Carla needs help managing her bills, and (2) if Carla passes away, Amanda automatically inherits the account, avoiding a lengthy probate. But is this straightforward addition of Amanda’s name to the CD truly a valid “gift” creating a joint tenancy or tenancy by the entireties (if spouses were involved)? Florida courts say it depends on a few key requirements.
Florida courts have long held that three elements are crucial to forming any valid gift—whether it’s an outright gift or one that creates a joint interest. In Chase Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Sullivan, 127 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1961), the court reaffirmed these requirements:
If any of these three elements is lacking, the gift fails. Let’s walk through how they apply to Carla and Amanda’s situation.
Carla tells Amanda, “I want you on this account so you can pay any bills if I’m ill, and eventually have the rest after I’m gone.” Is that enough? Under Florida law, Carla must have a present intent to transfer some ownership now. If she’s merely saying, “You’ll get this after I die,” that is a future gift—more akin to a will. As the Florida Supreme Court held in In re Slawson’s Estate, 41 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 1949), a “mere intention to give in the future” is not enforceable.
Typically, a donor must physically hand over the gift or sign over title. For intangible assets like a bank account, Florida courts have eased this requirement. In Spark v. Canny, 88 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 1956), the Supreme Court recognized that where a donor and donee share a joint account, the “thing given” is not the specific money in the account but rather the right to withdraw. Consequently, Carla could keep making withdrawals for herself and still validly gift a present interest to Amanda.
Acceptance of a beneficial gift—like a share in a CD—is usually presumed. Rarely would Amanda reject this financial benefit. In the (unlikely) event Amanda refused or never knew about the joint account, the validity of the gift might be questioned. But in Florida, courts typically assume acceptance when the gift has clear financial value. As confirmed in Naylor v. U.S. Trust Company of Florida, 711 So. 2d 1350 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), acceptance can be inferred from the donee’s conduct and the nature of the asset.
Carla’s intention is to provide for Amanda during Carla’s life (and beyond). This setup is a gift inter vivos—an unconditional, immediate transfer of interest. If Carla were gifting the account because she believed she was on her deathbed, hoping that Amanda would own it if she succumbed to her illness, it might be a gift causa mortis. Florida law imposes stricter rules on gifts causa mortis (see Leonard v. Campbell, 138 Fla. 405, 189 So. 839 (1939)), because they can be revoked if the donor recovers.
The mere presence of Amanda’s name on the account typically raises a rebuttable presumption (meaning it be challenged) that Carla made a gift. As Florida courts note in cases like Varela v. Bernachea, 917 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), the burden shifts to anyone challenging the gift (for example, Carla’s other relatives) to prove Carla did not intend a present transfer. If Carla’s estate, after her death, claimed that “Carla only put Amanda on the account for convenience,” they would need clear and convincing evidence—such as statements from Carla disclaiming Amanda’s ownership or proof that Carla forbid Amanda from withdrawing funds.
If Carla has done everything correctly:
Assuming none of Carla’s heirs can convincingly rebut that intent, Amanda stands to inherit the entire account automatically when Carla passes away—without the asset going through probate. This convenience is one of the main reasons many Floridians choose to create joint interests by gift for bank accounts, CDs, and other financial assets.
Creating a joint interest by gift in Florida hinges on present intent, delivery, and acceptance—elements often examined under a more flexible standard when it comes to joint bank accounts. The story of Carla and Amanda shows how a clearly documented, intentional process can give the donee real ownership now, and a straightforward right of survivorship later. But it also highlights the pitfalls if you’re not explicit: future promises, unclear account titles, or half-executed transfers can derail even well-meaning plans.
By understanding the legal framework and planning carefully—preferably with guidance from a qualified Florida attorney—individuals like Carla can ensure their gifts stand on firm ground. In doing so, they help prevent family feuds and guarantee that their generosity benefits their chosen loved ones in the way they truly intend.
Matthew T. Morrison
A graduate of Jones Law, he is our team lead for the probate department and case management. He is the one to establish the plan in court.
Carlos E. Carrillo
A graduate of St Thomas Law, Carlos is head of client management and client relations. He is the master of what happens out of court.
Carlos E. Carrillo
A graduate of St Thomas Law, Carlos is head of client management and client relations. He is the master of what happens out of court.
TESTIMONIALS
Probate Lawyers serving Polk County Florida, including: Lakeland, Winter Haven, Bartow, Auburndale, Babson Park, Bowling Green, Bradely Junction, Brewster, Combee Settlement, Crooked Lake Park, Crystal Lake, Cypress Gardens, Davenport, Dundee, Eagle Lake, Fort Meade, Frostproof, Fussels Corner, Gibsonia, Green Pond, Haines City, Highland Park, Highlands City, Hillcrest Heights, Jan Phyl Village, Inwood, Kathleen, Lake Alfred, Lake Hamilton, Lake Wales, Lakeland Highlands, Mulberry, Polk City, Willow Oak, Wahneta, Waverley, Hillsborough County Florida, including: Tampa, Brandon, Plant City, Citrus Park, Temple Terrace, Apollo Beach, Balm, Bealsville, Bloomingdale, Cheval, Dover, Egypt Lake-Leto, Fort Lonesome, Gibsonton, Greater Carrollwood, Greater Sun Center, Gulf City, Hopewell, Keysville, Lake Magdalene, Lithia, Lutz, Mango, Orient Park, Palm River-Clair Mel, Pebble Creek, Progress Village, Riverview, Ruskin, Seffner, Sun City, Thonotosassa, Town 'N Country, Turkey Creek, Valrico, Westchase, Wimauma, Ybor City, Orange County Florida, including: Orlando, Maitland, Apopka, Winter Park, Alafaya, Bay Lake, Belle Isle, Bithlo, Christmas, Doctor Phillips, Eatonville, Edgewood, Fairway Shores, Goldenrod, Gotha, Hunter's Creek, Lake Buena Vista, Lockhart, Meadow Woods, Oakland, Ocoee, Orlovista, Pine Castle, Pine Hills, Southchase, South Apopka, Taft, Tangerine, Union Park, Wedgefield, Williamsburg, Windermere, Winter Garden, Zellwood, Central Florida and throughout the State of Florida.